The Reason we go into Their Statutory Courts in "Common Law" is because of these 12 Presumptions

1) The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a court is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter.

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is rebuked and rejected and demanded the matter is to be on the Public Record.

2) The Presumption of Public Service and that all members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or "public officials" by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private "superior" oaths to their own Guild.

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; the possibility of this matter being a private matter is rebutted. All persons engaged in the matter at hand, are deemed to be in public service, as public servants.

3) The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of "public officials" who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartially and fairly as dictated by their oath. It is openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. It is openly challenged and such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot stand under a public oath.

Suggested Rebuttal

The possibility of this is rebutted and all public servants acting on behalf of this matter are required to state all sworn oaths, both public and private.

4) The Presumption of Immunity is, that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of "public officials" acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability.

Suggested Rebuttal

This is absolutely rebutted. Any person acting as an agent for a nameless, faceless corporation is wholly personally responsible for their actions on behalf of the corporation. All actions incurring any degree of injury will incur Notice of Injury, including severe financial penalty.

5) The Presumption of Summons is, that by custom a summons un- rebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons.

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is absolutely rebutted, on this occasion, on past occasions, and on all future occasions. However, at no time am I absent, nor silent with regard to the matters at hand.

6) The Presumption of Custody is, that by custom if a summons is not rebutted, it stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by "Custodians". Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of property and "things" not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians.

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is absolutely rebutted. I am alive and well and a man, I am not in custody by Custodians or Guardians. I am not a "thing".

I am not the property of the Court. Under no circumstances may I be detained in any way whatsoever, nor at any time, past, present or future.

7) The Presumption of the Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a "resident" of a ward of a local government area, you are a pauper and therefore under the "Guardian" powers of the government and its agents as a "Court of Guardians". Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption is rebutted that I am by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court)

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is absolutely rebutted. I am at all times the General Guardian and General Executor of all my matters including those currently under discussion, and I am a victim of a system of debtism, employed by a private banking system upheld by a private Bar Guild.

8) The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that the members of the Private Bar Guild presume you accept the office of trustee as a "public servant" and " government employee" just by attending the Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Court. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by "special attendance" to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction simply because you "appeared".

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is absolutely rebutted. Absolutely no jurisdiction, at any time, may be claimed by the Private Bar Guild and the Court over me. The office of trustee is rejected. The role of public servant and government employee is rejected. However, the need for each of us to contribute to the wellbeing of community is acknowledged and graciously embraced.

9) The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate).

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is rebutted. I am the General Executor, General Guardian and Beneficiary with regard to all matters pertaining to the legal person JOHN HENRY DOE, as well as the living flesh and blood man, john henry doe

10) The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort, is the presumption that the accused does not seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind, soul living man. The magistrate is acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a "false executor" challenging the "rightful" [wo]man as Executor. Therefore, the magistrate assumes the role of "true" executor and has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation.

Unless this presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting one's position as Executor as well as questioning if the magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption stands and a magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek the assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim.

Suggested Rebuttal

This presumption is rebutted. Under no circumstances may the magistrate attempt to assume the role of Executor. Before any personal attendance before a court is undertaken to discuss matters at hand, the magistrate will need to put in writing that this is clearly understood, fully disclosed and acknowledged.

11) The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into psychiatric evaluation.

Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent, then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient.

Suggested Rebuttal

This is rebutted. The Law is under scrutiny for its contribution to the current state of the planet, the distribution of rights and resources and the obstruction of Divine Law. In discussion regarding such matters, no privilege of deeming a [wo]man incompetent is permitted.

12) The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead "guilty", do not plead or plead "not guilty". Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call demurer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from you.

Suggested Rebuttal

This is rebutted. Under no circumstances is a presumption of Guilt allowed. Under no circumstances may I be detained. Under no circumstances may any financial transaction occur, in the favor of the Guild until the claims of the private corporation are investigated

http://commonlawteam.com is about the Rights of Man and Man's God-given RIGHT to settle matters of controversy solely in "Common-Law" by the way of a court of record.